The University is committed to conducting its activities fairly, honestly and openly, in accordance with relevant legislation, and to the highest standards of integrity. The University has no tolerance of bribery. This includes active bribery (the offering, promising or giving of a bribe) and passive bribery (the requesting, agreeing to receive or accepting of a bribe). Further, the University believes that action against bribery is in the broader interests of society. As a charity deriving a significant proportion of its income from public funds, benefactions and charitable organisations, the University is concerned to protect its operations and reputation and its funders, donors, staff and students from the detriment associated with bribery and other corrupt activity. It is therefore committed to preventing bribery by its staff and any third party acting for or on behalf of the University.
The University will take appropriate action to prevent bribery in respect of its activities. Where bribery is shown to have occurred, the University will take firm action, which may include dismissal and legal action. Bribery by University employees or student members acting on behalf of the University will be treated as a serious disciplinary offence.
Staff and associated persons who act on behalf of or provide services to the University are expected to act at all times in a manner that is fair, impartial, and without favouritism or bias. In order to conduct the activities of the University to the highest standards of integrity, in accordance with relevant legislation, and to ensure that there can be no suspicion or appearance of corruption, they are expected to abide by the following standards:
This Policy applies to all staff and associated persons of the University. It shall be made generally available and published publicly via the University website.
This Policy has been adopted by Council and applies throughout the University apart from Oxford University Press, which has its own complementary Policy and procedures. This Policy applies in full to majority and wholly owned University subsidiary companies unless separate policies have been formally approved and adopted by the Boards of those companies and endorsed by Council’s General Purposes Committee.
Bribery is the offering, promising, giving, requesting, or accepting of a financial or other advantage with the intention to induce or reward improper performance. Additional information about this definition is provided on the University website.
Every member of staff and associated person who acts on behalf of or provides services to the University is responsible for ensuring that they comply at all times with this Policy and guard against the commission of bribery.
The Registrar is responsible for ensuring that this Policy is implemented and maintained and that appropriate explanatory guidance is provided.
Heads of Division, Heads of Department (including Faculty Board Chairs), and Heads of University Services (UAS and ASUC) are responsible for ensuring that staff within their divisions, departments or sections (as appropriate), affected students, and other associated persons are made aware of this Policy and associated explanatory guidance.
The Boards of Directors of majority and wholly owned subsidiary companies of the University are responsible for ensuring that this Policy, or an alternate Policy that is approved by Council’s General Purposes Committee, is implemented and maintained within those companies, and that staff and other associated persons are made aware of the Policy and associated explanatory guidance.
Bribery risk should be regularly assessed as a specific part of the wider risk assessment and management performed by divisions, departments and committees. Significant transactions – those that are of high value, or high risk, or high profile – should always be subject to a specific bribery risk assessment. High risk transactions are those where there is a significantly increased risk of bribery due to the nature of the transaction, the third party, territory, opportunity or sector. Proportionate preventative and detective controls should be identified and implemented, together with regular reviews to determine their efficacy. Where risk assessments indicate a significant risk that bribery might occur appropriate due diligence must be conducted prior to proceeding with the relevant transaction. The University provides specific guidance to aid the completion of risk assessments and on the conduct of appropriate due diligence into significant transactions that may be subject to heightened risk.
The University expects third parties acting for or providing services to the University not to commit bribery and will take appropriate measures and action should it discover that third parties are engaging in bribery. Third parties are advised, therefore, to make themselves fully aware of the provisions of this Policy and, in particular, the Standards relating to bribery. Where appropriate, the University will include contractual obligations in respect of adherence to this Policy in its agreements with third parties.
The University recognizes that exceptional instances might arise in which a bribe or facilitation payment is demanded of a member of staff or person acting for or providing services to the University where refusal may cause immediate personal danger to that individual. In such circumstances, where there is a real and immediate threat to life, limb or liberty, payment is permitted but must be reported, in accordance with the Procedures set out at section 8, either when the event occurs or as soon as possible thereafter.
This Policy interacts and overlaps with a number of other University policies and procedures:
This Policy also takes account of the University’s wider legislative obligations and provisions pertaining to bribery and associated behaviour as set out in but not limited to:
Individuals who reasonably suspect the occurrence of bribery in the context of the University’s activities should report their concerns as soon as possible to the Director of Finance, the Registrar or to email@example.com, providing a brief description of the alleged irregularity, and any evidence that supports the allegations or irregularity and identifies the individual or individuals responsible. Any report will be treated as a disclosure under the University’s Public Interest Disclosure (whistle-blowing) Code of Practice and it will, therefore, be brought to the attention of the Registrar who will decide on the procedure to be adopted and determine whether there is a case to answer.
Subjecting people who have reported reasonably-held concerns or suspicions to any detriment will be regarded as a disciplinary issue, as will abuse of process by making malicious allegations.
Where the Registrar has determined that there is a case to answer, the matter will be taken forward under this Policy. It will be considered by a Bribery and Fraud Review Group (‘BFRG’) comprising:
With the agreement of all other members of the Group, the officers named may send nominated delegates on those occasions when they are unavailable in person.
The BFRG may call upon the advice of any other person with specialist, technical or professional knowledge that may be relevant to the particular case under consideration. If at any point there is a suspicion that the conduct complained of includes unlawful conduct, the BFRG will take immediate steps to secure appropriate professional advice as to the steps required before proceeding further.
The BFRG will decide on such further steps as are necessary including:
- whether there are issues that should be referred to the appropriate funding body under the terms of any grant to which the allegations relate;
- whether the incident should be reported to HEFCE under the terms of the Memorandum of Assurance and Accountability; and
- whether the matter should be reported to HMRC;
and will take steps to ensure that the relevant actions are undertaken as soon as is reasonably practicable.
In any case where immediate action is required, the Registrar or Director of Finance may take the steps he or she deems necessary. Where such action is taken, the Registrar or Director of Finance as appropriate shall report his or her actions and reasoning to the BFRG as soon as possible thereafter.
In any case where a member of the BFRG is the subject of an investigation under the Policy, the Vice-Chancellor or, if he or she is the subject of complaint, the Chancellor will appoint an alternate or alternates to fulfil the role or roles specified under the Policy.
Investigations will normally be carried out by the Internal Auditor or an alternative agreed by the BFRG, taking account of appropriate professional practice, and any relevant guidance issued from time to time by HEFCE, the Charity Commission or any other relevant regulatory body. The investigator will keep the BFRG informed as to the progress of the investigation and will complete the investigation as soon as reasonably possible.
In cases which involve or may involve students, the Proctors will be informed at the outset of the investigation. If a student is the subject of an allegation of bribery, this will be dealt with by the Proctors under the disciplinary procedures applicable to students.
Where an allegation of bribery concerns a member of staff, Personnel Services must be consulted.
Subject to the advice of Personnel Services, any member of staff suspected of bribery may be suspended (without deduction of pay) pending a full investigation. No one person, acting on his or her own volition, may move to suspend a member of staff in such circumstances. The suspension of a member of staff does not constitute a finding of misconduct against him or her. Any staff suspended as a result of a suspected bribery will be informed of the reason for the suspension.
Individuals suspended for suspected bribery, and individuals suspended to enable a proper investigation to be carried out, will normally be required to leave University premises immediately and will be denied access to the University’s IT facilities. During the period of any suspension they will not be permitted to return to the premises, to make contact with staff or witnesses, or to act on behalf of the University, unless given express permission to do so by the relevant University authorities. Any infringement of this requirement may be treated as a disciplinary offence.
All persons involved with the investigation must treat the information in strict confidence. Where necessary, information will be transmitted in confidence to relevant regulatory bodies. An unwarranted breach of confidence may be the subject of disciplinary action.
In all cases where the police are involved, the University reserves the right, where it would be reasonable to do so, to proceed with its own disciplinary procedures and/or with civil proceedings.
If the Registrar deems that there is a case to answer, the BFRG will notify the Vice-Chancellor and the Chair of the Audit and Scrutiny Committee that a matter has been reported and will be investigated under this Policy; and the BFRG will provide further and confidential interim reports as are deemed necessary. Such reports may be oral or written.
The University will notify HEFCE of any serious incidents of bribery as required by the terms of HEFCE’s Memorandum of Assurance and Accountability.
The investigator will prepare a report of their investigation for submission to the BFRG: the BFRG will be responsible for considering the findings and making recommendations to the Vice-Chancellor. The final report will be provided in strict confidence to the Vice-Chancellor and to the Chair of the Audit and Scrutiny Committee. The Chair of the Audit and Scrutiny Committee may, at his or her discretion, share the final report in strict confidence with the Audit and Scrutiny Committee.
The final report will contain:
The Registrar shall maintain a register (the ‘Register’) of all allegations of bribery which are reported within the University (except Oxford University Press, which maintains its own records), including those where there was found to be no case to answer.
The Register will be maintained and will be available for inspection, subject to the requirements of the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
The Register shall specify the following, in an anonymised form, in relation to each case of bribery:
Subject to the findings of the final report and agreement of recommended actions, the individual or individuals involved will be informed of the outcome as soon as possible after its presentation to the Vice-Chancellor and Chair of the Audit and Scrutiny Committee and, if relevant, to the Audit and Scrutiny Committee.
The complainant will be informed in broad terms of the outcome of the investigation, having due regard to the confidentiality of information relating to the individual or individuals accused and others identified in the report.
Approved by Council on 20 June 2016
A downloadable PDF version of this policy is also available: